Helmut Raiser's View on Which Drives Are
Useful During Protection Training
by Armin Winkler
http://www.finographics.com/schutzhund/
Prey-drive,
defense-drive, fighting-drive, etc. are the catch phrases of modern protection
training. They are thrown around at every seminar we attend, they
are the subjects of countless articles, but rarely do people agree on what is
being said about these "drives." About 20 years ago Helmut
Raiser revolutionized Schutzhund protection training by identifying which inborn
motivations (drives) are stimulated in the different phases of training. He
did not just assign specific names to these motivations, he combined years of
practical experience and research with the clinical studies and their results of
such behaviourial giants like Brunner, Hediger, Lorenz, Most, and Trummler
among others, to determine on a scientific level what drives are and how they
fit into protection training. Without any further introduction, let
me summarize his findings from his now famous book Der Schutzhund.
Prey Drive
Prey drive is part
of a dog's food gathering behavior. In a predatory animal that means prey drive
governs hunting and killing techniques. Chasing, flushing, pouncing, biting, and
shaking-to-death, are the most important of these techniques when we are talking
about protection training. In order to stimulate these instinctive techniques in
the dog, we have to keep in mind what a real prey animal does when it is hunted.
Prey is always on the move, it always moves in an evasive fashion, and it is
panic-stricken. These behaviors in turn trigger pursuit, pouncing,
biting, pulling, and shaking-to-death in the dog. Prey drive is inborn,
and is a trainable instinct, meaning it can be enhanced or reduced. Prey drive
can be exhausted, meaning that a time will come when the dog "doesn't feel
like performing the desired behaviors any more." Author's note:
Considering the serious effects the end result of this drive would have on a
prey animal, I do not subscribe to the idea that prey work is only a silly game.
Defense Drive
http://www.finographics.com/schutzhund/
Defense drive counts
as one of the dog's aggression behaviors, and it can appear in conjunction with
other behaviors. Threatening, staring, and biting are typical defensive
reactions. Defense behavior is generally triggered by threats, real or
perceived, or open aggression. The goal of defense behavior is always to
create avoidance behavior in the threatener. Defense drive may appear as
defense of prey, defense of puppies, defense of territory, defense against the
unfamiliar, or self-defense. The drive is satisfied in each case when the
aggressor shows avoidance behavior. Defense drive is not subject to
exhaustion, so it can be activated at will. It should, therefore, be part of the
combative behavior of any protection dog. Furthermore, it is responsible
for behaviors like countering when under stress or when threatened. The
great danger when working a dog in defense drive is that the same stimuli which
cause defense behavior also cause avoidance behavior. Which of the two
possible behaviors is displayed by a dog when a trigger stimulus is presented
is dependant on a variety of factors, among them confidence and temperament of
the dog as well as the threatener, "life" experiences of the dog, age
and maturity of the dog, location (unfamiliar or home turf), distance between
adversaries, and the presence of other external influences (prey, mate,
puppies). Author's note: Hopefully this allows people to see defense for
the double-edged sword it is. Defense is one part of protection training.
The idea that good dogs should only be worked in defense is a dangerous one
which has wrecked many great dogs.
Aggression Drive
Aggression
behavior contains reactive aggression (defense) as well as active aggression (social
aggression). With all the different theories that exist about aggression,
there still is no conclusive proof available as to whether or not genuine
spontaneous aggression exists. The three theories about where aggression
comes from are:
The truth is
probably that aggression results from all three processes. Research is
available to support all three theories. For our purposes however, we
should concern ourselves less with where aggression comes from and more with
what triggers it, what its goal is, and what its biological significance is.
The triggers for reactive aggression (defense) was covered under the previous
heading. So, lets deal with active aggression. It is always
intraspecific, meaning social aggression, and is the result of competition over
things (territory, food, mates, etc.). Intraspecific aggression is
activated by rivals, and by anti-social behavior. The goal of the drive
is to cause avoidance, submission, or worse of the rival. Biological
significance is the even distribution of a species over available land to reduce
the possibility of food shortages and epidemics as well as survival of a species
and a pack by selecting the fittest animals for reproduction and as leaders.
In species with a social hierarchy behaviors developed from the aggressive
drive, which limit the negative results and guarantee the positive results of
social aggression such as threatening, dominance, submission, and rituals of
non-physical combat.
http://www.finographics.com/schutzhund/
Aggression increases
through maturation and practice. It can also be increased or decreased
through training and through external influences, for example pain can be
aggression stimulating. Other factors which affect aggressive behavior are location and hormone levels. Two factors which affect aggression that
a protection helper needs to be aware of are: personal acquaintance blocks
aggression; and passive acceptance of a dog's aggression impresses a dog deeply
and causes unsure ness.
A negative side
effect of aggression in dog training is that it greatly reduces the dog's
learning ability.
Author's note: We
all want to see our dogs work aggressively against the "bad guy," but
we need to keep in mind that that is the final picture we want to see. Too
often high quality dogs don't reach their potential because their owners want to
see them aggressive right from the start, forgetting about the fact that the dog
has to learn many intricate exercises before he can walk onto the competition
field. So if possible teach the dog an exercise first, then make him
perform it aggressively.
Fighting Drive
Again the question
of whether or not an independent fighting drive exists has not yet been
answered. Some dog-experts feel that a fighting drive must exist and that
it is related to the play drive. The term fighting drive is an oxymoron.
It combines the word drive refers to an inherited trait which serves to preserve
life and species, with the word fight which refers to physical combat. A
drive to fight would then be an internal motivation which leads the animal into
a potentially harmful situation. But even in social aggression the
non-physical ritualistic showdowns are much more common than the injurious
physical fights. However, that argument aside, the term fighting drive is
a useful description of a desirable behavior in the dog. We want to see a
dog who has fun fighting with the helper. But only a dog who doesn't feel
like he is fighting for his life can be unstressed and have fun. Therefore
I (Raiser) feel that fighting drive is an extension of prey drive.
What qualities make
up good fighting drive - meaning the spontaneity? Practical experience has
shown that dogs who work primarily in as a result of their defensive drive may
still lack fighting drive. Dogs like that then often fail to engage the
helper if he does not present any defensive stimuli, but work confidently while
under threat. The desire to "seek the fight" is an essential
ingredient of fighting drive. In all dogs with pronounced fighting drive,
I also found pronounced prey drive. Making prey is a passionate activity
which does not stress the dog. However, prey drive alone is not equal to
fighting drive, the dog also has to use defense behavior. The fundamental
component of fighting drive is the active part of the aggressive drive, social
aggression. Therefore, the dog must always see the helper as a rival.
The object of competition could vary: it could be the prey (hence the relation
to prey drive); or it could be social rank, which works well with dominant dogs.
So in order to increase fighting drive, we have to promote prey drive, build up
defense drive, and strengthen aggression by teaching the dog that he can defeat
and dominate the helper. This should make it very clear that as much as
fighting drive is a very desirable quality, one cannot expect to see it fully
developed in a one year old dog.
Author's note: Do
your dogs a favor and help them develop all the components that make up good
fighting drive, rather than waiting until it magically appears out of thin air
because the dog should have "it" naturally.
What impresses me
about the discussion of drives every time I read Helmut Raiser's book is that he
simply dissects the material on a scientific basis. He does not try to
make the theory fit his practical techniques, on the contrary he willingly
admits to his own past mistakes, and tries to improve his practical skill by
better understanding the theory behind it. I will probably summarize the
practical applications of these theories at some time in the future. For
people who can't wait, the full length version is available in my translation of
the book Der Schutzhund.
http://www.finographics.com/schutzhund/
Tracking Obedience
Protection Sport
BH Humor ZTP
Reading Friends
Triple D
Guest book Awards
Webdesign Working Links Sitemap
Top